Baket muntik na mawalan ng pulso si Tita Amy dahil kay Renato

Ganito ang kwento,

si Renato (tawagin natin siyang Papa Ren) may ka-live-in,

ang pangalan ng ka-live-in nya si Nelia. Tawagin natin syang Pamela-mela 1. Sabi ni 1, dati raw siyang "tomboy" pero ngayon in-love na sya sa lalake - sa katauhan ni Renato - dahil

"masarap" daw at "lahat binibigay nya."



Pero, si Renato meron din daw

Melinda (ang asawa daw ni Melinda nasa abroad) - may 5 anak. Tawagin natin siyang Pamela-mela 2.


Sabi naman ni Melinda, si Renato daw

"mabait," "lagi nasa tabi ko,"

"mapagmahal, maalalahanin (at) malambing."



Pero ulit, si Renato meron din daw

Rosa Mia (hiwalay sa asawa at may 3 ang anak). Siya naman si Pamela-mela 3.

Gusto ni Rosa Mia si Renato dahil

"mabait sya, magaling magalaga sa anak ko (at)

pinangakuan nya ko na lilipat kami sa Tarlac."



In summary, sabi ni Pamela-mela 1:


"Mahal ko (si Renato)."


sabi ni Pamela-mela 2:


"Mahal na mahal ko (si Renato). Higit sa buhay ko ang pagmamahal kosa kanya."


sabi ni Pamela-mela 3:

"Mahal na mahal ko sya hanggang kamatayan
naniniwala ako na sya makakasama ko hanggang pagkamatay ko."




Ang hindi alam ni Pamela-mela 2 may Pamela-mela 3 si Renato (& vice versa).

Hindi rin nila alam na may Pamela-mela 1 na pala.


Eto namang si Pamela-mela 1, alam na may Pamela-mela 2 at Pamela-mela 3 si Renato at okay lang daw eto sa kanya.


Maya-maya, lumabas si Renato para ipakita at i-isplika kung bakit sobra siyang pogi.

Dito niya inamin na kaya siya may Rosa Mia ay dahil nakukuhanan niya eto ng barbecue na siyang pinang-uulam nila ni
Pamela-mela 1

-- with matching turning the tables against Rosa Mia, pinamukha niya kay Rosa na eto ang may kasalanan at hindi sya kasi

"ginusto mo rin naman di ba! Ikaw nagsabi na babayaran kita sa pamamagitan ng pagbibigay ko sayo ng kaligayahan diba!"

and yes, sinigurado ni Renato na siya pa ang galit. Para nga sana malipat dun sa isa yung pagsisisi at hindi sa kanya.


Pinamukha din ni Renato na si Rosa Mia ang nagyayaya at nagbabayad sa apartelle na pinag-pupulot-gataan nila bilang pruweba at pag highlight sa kasalanan ng huli para nga di mapansin ang mga kasalanan niya:

at ang mga eto ay:

1 ang pagmamanipula sa damdamin,

2 ang pagsisinungaling

3 at paggamit sa kahinaan ni Rosa Mia.


Bukod sa mga eto, ang winning statement of the day ay galing kay -- sino pa e di kay Papa Ren -- nang sinabi niya na:

"HINDI NGA AKO GUWAPO PERO MAGALING NAMAN AKO!"


Dito na nawalan ng pulso si Tita Amy.

Ang ibang nasa audience sinabunutan naman ang sarili.

Hindi nila kinaya ang kayabangan ni Papa Ren.






May kilala ka bang ganito ang ugali?

Alam niyo ba kung ano ang tawag sa ganyang ugali ni Papa Ren?


Mga ate at kuya, si Papa Ren may NPD - Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

Hindi ibig sabihin nito, lagi niyang tinitingnan ang sarili sa salamin.



Ang tingin ng mga taong may NPD sa mga kapwa nya tao ay mapag-kukunan ng supply.

Pag nakakita siya ng nilalang, ang default mindset nya: anong meron dito na pwde kong minahin?

Si Nelia may lupain sa Tarlac.

Si Rosa Mia, may barbecue-han na siyang pinagkukunan ni Papa Ren at ni Nelia ng ulam (na walang bayad). Si Rosa Mia din ang nagbabayad sa apartelle pag nag-ju-jugs-jugs-jugs-an sila ni Ren.

Si Melinda, binibigyan si Papa Ren ng ka-perahan courtesy of her OFW husband (kelangan nito ng sariling Face2Faceepisode).



Bale, ang tingin ng mga taong may NPD sa kanilang sarili ay "winner." Lagi silang "winner." Ang kaibahan nila sa mga taong may healthy sense of self ay wala silang pakielam kung sino maapakan nila, masaktan nila, magamit nila basta winner sila. Hindi sila papatalo.

Sa relasyon, gusto nila sila ang laging bida. Sila ang laging napapansin, pinapansin.

Ito ang dahilan kaya kumanta si Papa Ren. At ito rin ang dahilan kung bakit ayaw nya tumigil sa pagkanta. Tumigil lang sya ng hinagisan siya ni Rosa Mia ng upuan.

Kaya sinabi ni Papa Ren, "Ganyan ko sila nakuha." (tinutukoy niya ang maganda niyang pagkanta)
Kitam, nasa bokubularyo niya talaga ang "pag-kuha."


Gusto ni Papa Ren na siya ang kinaiinisan ng dalawa. Na siya ang nasa gitna ng gulo. Na siya ang pinapalakpakan / kinaiinisan ng madlang tao.

Feel na feel nya ang dedication na sinabi nya para kina Melinda at Rosa Mia:

"Sana sa awitin ko ay magbago ang buhay nyo."

Supply din kasi - hindi lang ang barbecue, pera o sex - ang atensyon na nakukuha niya mula sa dalawa.

O kahit anong atensyon ng kahit sino.

Atensyon ng pagmamahal man eto o galit - walang pinagkaiba. Ang mahalaga, napapansin siya. Pag napapansin siya, nabubuhayan siya ng loob. Pakiramdam niya buo siya. Pag pakiramdam niyang buo siya, maligaya siya. Pag maligaya siya, wala siyang pakielam kung masama ang loob ng iba.

Siya lang ang importante dito. Hindi ikaw. HIndi ibang tao.


Nakakawala talaga ng pulso ang pakikipag-interaksyon sa mga taong may NPD.

Uubusin kasi nila ang lahat ng buhay sa pulso mo, lahat ng pera sa bulsa mo, lahat ng atensyon mo sa sarili mo mawawala at mapupunta lang sa kanya, wala nang iba.

Pero, sa una, nakaka-humaling sila.

Nakaka-akit.

Parang ikaw lang ang tao sa mundo kasi ikaw lang ang pinapansin niya. Feeling bongga ka talaga.

Kasi, sa stage na ito, pinag-aaralan ka nya. Ano kahinaan mo. Ano mabibigay mo sa kanya. Hanggang saan lang kaya mong ibigay sa kanya, sinusulat nya na ang mga eto sa notebook nya sa ulo.

Pag alam na niya ang mga kaya niyang kunin sayo, ang gusto mong ibigay, ang kaya mo lang ibigay - madalas sa minsan - nahumaling ka na sa kanya. Nakadikit ka na sa kanya. Na-adik ka na sa binibigay niya at sa nakukuha mo rin sa kanya.


Si Nelia - porket alam niya na may dalawa pa bukod sa kanya - akala niya safe sya. Sya ang secondary narcissistic suppy ni Renato.

Si Melinda at Rosa Mia ang primary narcisstic supply. Ang Face to Face ang naging Primary Narcissistic Supply din ni Renato.

Kung wala nang makuhang supply si Renato kay Nelia, madalas sa minsan, hahanap at hahanap eto ulit.

Walang katapusang hanapan at pagsipsip ng supply ang buhay at trabaho ng taong may NPD.

Ngayong may alam ka na. Maging aware ka.

Subukan mong wag magkamali na baguhin sila. Madalas sa madalas, ikaw ang mababago ng taong may NPD. Kung hindi ka mawawalan ng pulso, makukuha nya ang katinuan/kapuso-an mo. Wag mong hayaang mangyari ito.

Totoo ba ang relasyon ni Papa P at KC? - UPDATED!

Totoo ba na si Imelda ang nag-utos na ipa-tsugi si Ninoy Aquino?

Totoo ba na may Kapre? Nakakita ka na ba ng kapre?

Kaya ba abutin ng dila mo ang iyong siko?



Totoo bang nag-ka-LQ si Papa P at KC?

Sabi ng Pep.ph nang tanungin nila ang isang source na close daw sa dalawa, sabi nito:

"May tampuhan but nothing serious. Normal lang naman (yun) for real relationships, di ba?"


Ano daw?

"May tampuhan but nothing serious. Normal lang naman (yun) for real relationships, di ba?"

Ulit?

"...Normal lang naman (yun) for real relationships, di ba?"

Isa pa.

"...for real relationships, di ba?"



"For REAL relationships?!"


Baket? Ang tampuhan ba ay hindi nangyayari sa isang fake relationship?

Ang tampuhan ba ay abnormal sa isang real relationship?

Ang tampuhan pa ay hindi normal sa isang fake relationship?


Bakit kelangan i-emphasize na ang REAL relationship ay may tampuhan.

Hindi ba normal na nangyayari ang tampuhan in `ANY relationship?'


'sa LAHAT ng relationship?'


or simply,


`sa RELATIONSHIP.'


Kelangan bang idagdag ang salitang "REAL?"

Baket dinagdag ng source ang salitang "REAL?"


At "di-ba?" pa ang last words ni ate o kuya. Hindi ka ba sure `te? Kinukumbinsi mo ba kausap mo na totoong nagkaka-tampuhan ang mga taong ka-close mo na nasa REAL relationship?

Observe nyo mga dabarkads hindi lang ang mga sinasabi ng tao kundi PAANO nila ito sinasabi. Madalas sa minsan kasi, mas marami kang makukuhang impormasyon sa pagkaka-ayos ng mga salitang binibigkas nila kaysa sa mga salita na tingin nila ay dapat mong marinig.

Pero hindi ako psychology ha, mahilig lang ako kumain ng Tuna, yun na!




ETO ANG LATEST STATEMENT NI PAPA P during the Star Magic Ball which he attended along with KC:

"Okay naman. We're happy. We're good together [and] very excited for the party," said Piolo with a smile when invited media asked him about the status of his relationship with KC."


May napansin ba kayo sa sagot nya?

Basahin nyo ulit.


Sabi nya, "We're happy. We're good together.."

Ayan na naman. Sabi ni Papa P, masaya daw sila at "We're good together.."

Napansin nyo ba yung dagdag na salita na pwede namang wala sa pangungusap, na di kelangan nasa pangungusap pero naanjan?

Pwde nya naman sabihin - na may confirmed finality na: "We're good."

Pero nilagyan nya pa ng "...together..."

Bat nya eto dinagdag?

In fairness, they do look good togteher. Is that what Piolo meant? They look good together thus the reason why they are together. Look good together according to whom? or what? whose standards? whose requirements?

ETO NAMAN ANG SABI NI KC:

"Masaya ako na napag-usapan na namin. At saka we really hope that it works out till the end, di ba?"


Ano naman napansin nyo sa sinabi ni KC?

Check nyo na naman ang unnecessary word additions. Mga words na di na kelangan sa statement. Na pwedeng wala sa pangungusap pero nilagay pa rin inspite of / despite of.

Bat hindi sinabi ni KC

"..we really hope that it works out." PERIOD.

Bat nya dinagdag:


"..till the end, di ba?"


MInsan kasi lumlusot sa kamalayan ng tao ang mga gusto nya talagang sabihin pero ayaw niyang ipaalam sa kahit kanino maski / at lalo na / sa kanyang sarili.

Till the end of what? i wonder?

Till the end of an agreement? a contract?

Hanggang sa katapusan ng alin? Ng relationship?

Kung nasa relationship ka, sasabihin mo ba sa jowa mo: I hope we work it out until the end. ?

Why would you expect "the end?" Or even bother to think or mention it? Pag nag start ka ng relationship with someone, would you wish you work it out until the end? O do you prefer na ang relationship nyo ay DI MAG END?


Saka ang "we really hope that it works out" na statement.

Hope ni KC na "IT" works out.

"IT" as in -- sa English grammar -- 3rd person point of view.

Sa basic grammar, ang 3rd person point of view "is told from an outside narrators point of view."

Kapag ginagamt ang pronoun na it - ang 3rd person point of view - hindi attached ang narrator sa nangyayari.

Is KC distancing herself from something?


Observe nyo mga dabarkads, minsan mas mdami makikita sa mga sinasabi kesa sa di sinasabi.

Pwede rin ito i-apply sa inyong personal life ok?

Watcha think?

Should you say sorry if you stepped on someone's foot?

Imagine yourself inside your grade 1 elementary school. You are the designated OIC - officer in charge - of the class while the Teacher is away. You still have your homework to do so you try to do both tasks at once.

Suddenly, a ruckus develops and your classmates are fighting over who has the most papers in one's intermerdiate pad. You ignore the noise so you can finish your homework.

The noise escalates. The group becomes more rowdy. You ignore it some more. A classmate records the scene in his celphone. The group hams it up for the celphone camera thus causing more noise and rowdiness until a classmate starts crying because someone spilled Zesto on his brand new socks. You approach the crying classmate to shut him up. He won't. You stomp your foot to make your point but you accidentally step on his. He cries further and demands an apology. Would you say sorry?

It was a rowdy room, everyone was being their worst. Surely, someone has stepped on someone's foot before, not just in this classroom but in other classrooms in other schools.

Should you say sorry at all?

Unfortunately / Fortunately, there are far worse problems than this, such as

The Manila Hostage Crisis Apology.

The only way the survivors and families of the Manila Hostage Crisis could get the government's apology is if they hold their own hostage-taking and demand it - though that still does not mean they will get their way but they can try.
Being non-locals, little do they know that the Philippine government cares little for its own citizens so

DILG Sec. Jesse Robredo implies: "Who are these foreigners to say that we should apologize to them? And what did we do that we should apologize for anyway?

We dont even apologize to the shit we make our countrymen go through everyday. So who are we to apologize to them, they are not even from here!"

In this context, he is being fair.

He - and PNoy - also said, shit like this happens everywhere, so there is no need for an apology. Look at Norway, PNoy said. A deranged gunman killed 70 people. "There were less casualties in the Manila 2010 Hostage, yes?"

True.

But there could have been none if PNoy or Robredo (in Robredo's own words of admitted regret "went to the scene earlier") were conscious enough to act what the moments called for -- alertness and intuitiveness, NOT passivity.

The Norway Tragedy was NOT a hostage taking incident. No demands were issued. No opportunities were given by the Norway gunman to the Norway government about him surrendering.

PNoy and Robredo need not fog or manipulate or confuse our already CO2-polluted brain.
They need not tell us that 1 + 1 = 3. We know our Math.

What the PH government and its authorities blatantly, obviously did - for all of the CNN-watching world to see -- was wait for a magical Deus Ex Machina or Bruce Willis.

Their reaction to the Manila Hostage Crisis is what their reaction is whenever there is a storm, a powerful Intertropical Convergent Zone, rain or flood attacking the country --- they suspend classes after students are already in schools.

They make sure they act whenever it is fashionably late to do so.

And PNoy and Robredo know they could have done better. And they didn't and wouldn't admit to that fact because their egos won't allow them. This is so obvious the BBC could not help but detail what the authorities should have done for our benefit.

PNOy's non-admission is so telling of what and how his mindset works that the country has to consider this as a glaring precedent of what the Philippines is to expect from the NoyNoy Administration until 2016 -- nothing at all (maybe except frustration).

As usual -- and as what happened during the Manila Hostage Crisis -- the frontliners stepped up to the plate because no one in higher authority wanted blood on their hands. "No one wanted to take the lead" Bernardo Espinosa, a SWAT police officer interviewed in History Channel's documentary on the Manila Hostage Massacre said, "so we had to."

It is from their group too via Chief Inspector Romeo Salvador who had the guts to actually say what PNoy and Robredo can't: SORRY.

PNoy's reaction now to the Manila Hostage Victims and Survivors call for an apology is probably his exact reaction during the actual hostage-taking --- a head-turning-looking-away denial whilst saying in his head:

"This too will end without me doing anything."

I have a feeling this is what he is saying now and until his term ends on 2016:

"This too will end without me doing anything."



But beyond sorry, it is not even PNoys non-apology that reeks of non-accountability.

He said he already said sorry by expressing regret


and then takes back what he said when he stated this week that,


NO he will not apologize.


Ano ba talaga kuya? May isang salita ka ba? Alam mo ba sinasabi mo? Sure ka ba? Sure ka na ba? Sure na sure ka na ba?


PNOy is a person that doesn't have a single word under his name - in Tagalog,

isa siyang taong walang salita.

I respect his position as president,

but I don't respect this dude as a person.


Why did you guys vote for PNoy again?

Non-accountability means never having to say you're sorry aka PNoy is NOT sorry for saying he's NOT sorry - Updated

I had a conversation with PNoy in my head after I read an article claiming that the Philippine government has reportedly met the demands of the bus hostage victims .



And should the bus hostage victims and survivors seriously expect the Philippine government to meet their demands when the bus hostage-taker's demands weren't? Irony and/or absurdity much?



I asked PNoy if he really said sorry and see what PNoy said :

How many times do I have to say sorry?

Let me state and show you the facts:

I never said sorry on my Official Statement on the August 23, 2010 hostage-taking incident at the Quirino Grandstand,

why should I say sorry now?

Cheezmiss: But last year you said you apologized to Hong Kong. The Philippine Star said so.

What I said was that I have "expressed sorrow and regret over what happened."


And never did I say in that Official Statement "sorry" or "apology." If you find these words, I will give you all of PCSO's money.


Cheezmiss: So you never apologized but you also said that your expression of sorrow and regret is an apology in itself.

Of course I have to make you think I apologized without actually doing it. It's called manipulation. I make you think what you want to hear and voila, you do!

That makes it easy for me to wiggle my way out of being accountable. You should do that sometimes.

Cheezmiss: Isn't that lying? I should lie too?


You should because if you do, you could get away with anything, See, no one cares now that I was inconsistent. Last year I made everyone believe that my expression of regret is equal to = an apology. Now, I can blatantly say I shouldn't apologize at all.


Cheezmiss: Are you making this up as you go along?


Is it illegal to change my statement as long as it serves the image I want to project?


Cheezmiss: What image?


That I am humble, I am not proud, I am not arrogant and that everyone's my boss; that I could eat a hotdog in NY and take with me my whole entourage than spend $1,000 per plate in a restaurant whose name the average Pinoy could not pronounce.


Cheezmiss: Bat di na lang kayo nagpabili ng hotdog sa entourage nyo?


I want people to see me being frugal and humble. Pogi points din yun iha.




Cheezmiss: Kaya ba sa media lang kayo nag-so-sorry tungkol dun sa Manila Hostage Crisis, hindi dun sa mga taong apektado?


Just because I didn’t do what they wanted when they wanted it, just because I didn’t say what they wanted to hear,

does not mean I have to say sorry.

I may be the Commander in Chief, but NONE of it was my fault. The incident was sparked by one man. You want me to admit that it was made worse by the fumbling and/or passive actions of the government? Why would I want to do that? You want me to admit my mistake? Admit that the government made a mistake? No one in their narcissistic minds would do that. I-hostage nyo na lang din ako kesa aminin ko yan.

And I am not an expert in this situation. Who will tell me what to do? Who will tell me? I was not informed on what to do and how to do it so I allowed the persons who are experts to handle it. They're big enough to know what they are doing. I am not going to put my foot down and order them around. Let them do what they are good at. Do I have to micromanage everything?

But take note that initially, the signs were actually encouraging. The hostage-taker - despite being replete with a handgun and an M16 rifle which he could use on the foreign hostages in broad daylight and spark an international incident - was not violent at all. So we were..


Cheezmiss: Complacent?


we were hungry so we ate at the nearby Emerald Restaurant.

Cheezmiss: Isa pa yun ser, you're presence was neither visible nor felt during the whole incident. It seems you didn't care, that you weren't paying attention to what was happening.


To be fair to Emerald, masarap siopao nila,


And who knew the hostage-taker could be violent at anytime, how am I supposed to know when?

What more do you want from me?


Cheezmiss: You didn't consult your experts?


Let me repeat, It's not my FAULT, it's not the government's fault. Let me justify the reasons why:

First justification - it was not me or the government who agitated him, it was that unknown person he was talking to on the phone while he was reading the contents of the letter from the Ombudsman who promised to review his case. Why would I step into this delicate situation? I don't even know - and do not want to know anything - about his case. I was not even President at the time his case with the Ombudsman was filed! Ask GMA! Maybe she'll say sorry again, but I won't.



Second justification - it was the hostage-taker's brother who added to the tension and which prompted the hostage taker to threaten the life of one of the hostages.

And the MEDIA! Don't get me started with the MEDIA!

If they had the self-awareness, self-discipline and empathy to regulate themselves and not wait for someone like me to rule them with an iron hand, none of the killings might have happened because none of the dramatic scenes would have been seen by the hostage-taker on the bus.

And the hostage-taker's cellphone -- CANNOT BE REACHED! He was not even answering the cell phone we gave him. I do not know why. Either he probably knew enough that he won't receive a call from me or he gave up hope that anyone could help with his case, I don't care! He was not answering his phone! Is that my fault too?

What finally pushed "the assault" on the bus was the escape of the driver. "A decision" was then made to immobilize the bus. Notice that I worded my statement enough to distance myself and anyone-in-authority from accountability.



Cheezmiss: Parang kung magsalita kayo parang sa Mars nangyari yung hostage-taking.


It's the only way I could mentally distance myself from the situation. I had nothing to do with "the assault" and the making of "a decision." Again, not my fault that "the incident tragically ended in the deaths of eight innocent civilians."


Cheezmiss: Kaya pala ung official statement nyo parang listahan ng mga may kasalanan. Like you're not part of it. Like you were far from it. As if you were not in a position to do anything about it. Kaya ba ser kalat kalat din mag-isip yung mga pulis. Kasi walang nag-uutos sa kanila?



"No one wanted to take the lead" Bernardo Espinosa, a SWAT police officer interviewed in History Channel's documentary on the Manila Hostage Massacre, "so we had to" he said.

Espinosa is spot-on because I obviously don't want blood on my hands. Period. But I did express "sorrow and deep condolences to the families of the victims whose lives were lost in the hostage situation at the Quirino Grandstand" like a good president should. I may not care about how my hair looks but I am as vain as my sister and I value the image I want to project.



And my non-apology should be enough.

“Why can’t you just get over the past?”

After the conversation with PNoy, my heart said:

Be afraid because:

PNoy's presidency says one thing while meaning another.

PNoy's presidency is blatantly inconsistent - a red flag for lying.


if PNoy does not want to admit accountability for an international crisis, he can easily do the same for a local one.


**sigh*** at least si GMA marunong mag-sorry.

10 Bagay na Dapat mong Gawin at 3 Bagay na Di Mo Dapat Gawin Kung Gusto Mong Mabigyan ng Pera ni Willie Revillame

Hindi na ako masyado nagsisimba kaya

nanonood na lang ako ng show ni WIlie Revillame.



Para ka na rin naman kasing nagsimba pag pinanood mo show ni Willie

(hindi ko na sasabihin pangalan ng show kasi baka mag-iba na naman pamagat nito next week, next month o next year. Napansin ko ang hindi lang nagbabago ay yung host ng show at ang style nito ng pamamahagi ng pera sa mga contestants na "pumipila mula pa madaling araw," na "galing sa Baguio," "galing sa Quezon," na `sumakay ng bus kasama ang 5 o 6 yr old na anak para magsilbing gabay sa mga bulag na mga magulang').

Gets nyo din ba na kaya mataas ang rating ng show ni Willie Revillame kasi ito ngayon ang live, real-time na Sample! ng modern-day na misa - at ang host nito ay ang 21st century self-professed na messiah-d?

Plus, nagbibigay din daw ang show ni Willie Revillame ng "bagong pag-asa," tulad din ng simbahang Katolika.

I-sight nyo, malamang sa hindi, ang show ni Willie - parang Holy Mass.

Unang-una, meron itong Introductory Rites.



Nagsisimula ito sa sayawan at/o kantahan. Kumabaga sa misa, eto yung part na nagpapaka Gloria in Excelsis Deo. Pagkatapos nito, saka e-enter ang Holy Host. Para ipakita ng tao ang kanilang pagpupuri, magtataas sila ng kanilang dalawang kamay in praise o adoration. By this greeting, the presence of the messiah is made manifest.


Ang show ni Willie, meron ding Liturgy of the Eucharist (ito ay dialogue sa pagitan ng pari at mga tao). Kung sa misa may dialogue ang pari at ang mga tao ay sumasagot sa pamamagitan ng responsorial psalm, ang show ni Willie meron ding ganito, mas free flowing lang.

Sa Kantanong segment, binabati at pinapasalamatan ng Host ang mga contestant, binabati at pinasasalamatan naman ng mga contestant ang Host, binabati at pinasasalamatan naman ng contestant ang kanyang dalang akay, at binabati/pinapasalamatan naman ng mga akay ang contestant na nagdala sa kanya sa show.



Libre pumuri ang contestant sa Host, ang Host sa contestant, ang akay sa Host at sa contestant. Pero ang Host lamang - kung gugustuhin nito - ang pwedeng magsalita at magsermon sa contestant at sa akay nito.

Ang mga manonood ay libre ding sabihin at any time during the show: "It is right to give him thanks and praise."




Ang Offertory segment naman ay pag nagbibigay ang mga manonood ng mga pagkain, bagay o gamit sa Host. Kapalit nito ay ang pamamahagi din ng Host sa mga manonood ng cellphone, jacket o pera.


Kung gusto mong makakuha ng mas mdaming pera mula sa show ni Willie Revillame, gawin mo ang mga sumusunod na tips:


1 Sabihin mong pogi at mabango si WIllie.

Babala lang: Hindi ito uubra kung ikaw ay contestant na lalake o babae na nasa edad 50 at pataas. Uubra lang ito kung ikaw ay babaeng contestant na may edad 18 - 25 at maganda sa paningin ng Host.





2 Sabihin mo: "Payakap"

Mabibigyan ka ng P1,000 - P3,000 kung ikaw ay akay ng contestant at hindi contestant mismo. Mas malamang na mabigyan ka kung ikaw ay matandang babae na nasa edad 50 yrs old and above.



3 Sabihin mo na malayo ang iyong pinanggalingan

Mas makakatulong kung ikaw ay mag-isang pumunta sa studio at dinagsa ang matinding baha, lindol o kalamidad para makarating lamang sa show. Siguraduhin mo na masabi mo lahat ng iyong ginawa para makita lamang ang Host. Pero siguraduhin mo na ang pagsabi mo hindi nagmamalaki. Dapat parang wala lang din sayo ang pinagdaanan mo. Pabayaan mong si Willie ang makapansin ng ginawa mo. Subukan mong siya mag-angat ng banko mo, hindi ikaw.


4 Magpanggap kang 80-90 years old na matandang babae.

Hindi ka lang mabibigyan ng pera, may libreng jacket at sponsor give-away ka pa.


5 Magbigay ka para ikaw ay mabigyan

Ito ay nasa Banal na Aklat kaya ito rin ang sinusunod ng Host. Maski isang supot ng pulburon, isang cake, mga kakanin, kung buo sa puso mo na makatanggap mula kay Willie Revillame, ikaw ay makakatanggap basta trip din niya na bigyan ka.


6 Sumayaw, sumunod ka sa gusto ng Host

Kung sabihin nya talon, tumalon ka. Kung sabihin nya kanta, kumanta ka. Kung sabihin nya sayaw, sumayaw ka. Magtiwala ka, siguradong mabibigyan ka. Yun na!


7 Magmakaawa ka

Noong Aug 16, 2011 episode ng show ni Willie Revillame, may contestant sa Baligtaran segment na na-Bokya. Umaasa siyang magbibigay si Host ng higit pa sa kaunti niyang napanalunan. At tulad ng inaasahan niya, pina-asa nga sya ng Host. Nakalabas na ang babae mula sa stage - at sinundan sya ng kamera sa kanyang paglalakad at pag-iyak. Nung tinawag sya muli pabalik ng Host sa stage, nagmamadaling tumakbo ang babae at niyakap ang Host. Sinabihan siya ni Willie: "Kumbinsihin mo ko!" (`Kung karapat-dapat nga kitang bigyan')

At tulad ng inaasahan, nag-kunwaring magmakaawa ang babae, with matching iyak at pag-ingit. Sa huli, nabigyan din sya. O di ba.



8 Magpatawa ka

Kung kwela ka, may pera ka!


9 Magpasikat ka

Kung totoong magaling kang kumanta, sumayaw o may talento na talagang kabilib-bilib, may palakpak ka na, may pera ka pa!



10 Makisakay ka

Kung hindi ka sumasangayon sa sinabi ng Host, e.g. "Dapat lahat tayo gumamait araw araw ng Ligo Sardines at kumain ng Gluta White soap" um-OO ka! Kung hindi, babarahin ka niya, wala ka pang anda.



Amg mga susunod naman ay mga bagay na di mo dapat gawin kung gusto mong mabigyan ng pera ni Willie.

1 Magdasal

Uubra lang ito kung ang dadasalan at luluhuran mo ay ang Host mismo.


2 Magpa-awa

Iba ito sa nagmamaka-awa. Ang magpa-awa ay pag-kukuwento - ng hindi tinatanong ni Willie - tungkol sa iyong malungkot o mabigat na nararamdaman dahil sa kawalan ng pera o anuman. Mas uubra kung ikaw ay nagkukuwento na parang wala lang, Mejo mahirap ito pero sulit. Kelangan lang i-balanse mo ang pagkukuwento na may sundot sa puso na hindi halatang nanghihingi. Mas makakatulong kung lagyan mo ng konting pag-amin. na kumbaga may pagkakamali ka rin kaya ka nandyan ngayon sa kinalalagyan mo. Kung hindi distracted ang Host at mapansin niya ang iyong pinagdaanan o pinagdadaanan at bibigyan ka ng, "Okay lang yan, lahat naman tayo nagkakamali, etc.) yun na! Itihaya mo na ang kamay mo! Now na!


3 Magkaroon ng sariling opinyon

Kung tingin mo at buo ang paniniwala mo na gagalisin ka pag nag-sardinas ka araw araw at mahal mo ang kayumanggi mong balat at magalang mo itong sinabi sa Host at sa buong madlang people, sori ka na lang dahil hindi ginagalang ng show ang may mga buo at sariling opinyon tungkol sa sarili nila at sa mga bagay-bagay.




(Disclaimer: Ang mga tips na ito ay mga suggestions lang. Nasa discretion (at mood) pa rin ng Host kung siya ay mamimigay man o hindi. Suntok sa buwan, ang pamimigay ni Host ng kaperahan ay weather weather lang.)