8/5/12

Philippines' Autistic Top 5 - Updated

Define "autistic."

(Note that this post was inspired by a tweet made by Journalist Raissa Writer when she described the AntiRHBill rally headed by the Catholic Church)

@raissawriter In an apparent taunt directed at PNoy, Archbishop said Church is "not autistic"



M Scott Peck in his book People of the Lie define autism as:

"The utter failure to submit oneself to reality."

"The word comes from the Greek root `auto,' meaning "self." The person who is autistic is oblivious to certain essential dimensions of reality. Such people literally live "in a world of their own" in which the self (or the identity of the self) reigns supreme."
(p.162)

I am unsure how the Church defines "autistic" in reference to whoever it is referencing to.

But the term "autistic" as used in this post is NOT medical autism but spiritual and emotional autism that makes one unable to surrender one's self to reality and so restricts one's self to his/her/its own view of the world in order to pursue its selfish agenda.

So far, the following are the top 5 "autistic" people, individuals, life forms in the country. There are more autistics out there, but this list includes those whose autism exerts the most influence in everyone's minds and hearts.

Be aware or be square.




1 The Catholic Church

The Catholic Church wants to insert themselves in any issue that would give them mileage - politically, emotionally, `spiritually,' religiously, educationally and media-wise.

Why?

That would buy them face-time on TV, radio, the net and news print. Exposure is important. It reminds everyone they still exist, that their opinions still matter, that whatever they say still holds sway among their flock of sheep, that they could say the blackpen is blue and people would still believe it as true, that they could still influence thought and action, that their business is still running, that consumers are still buying their shit/want their shit/crave to be blessed by their shit.

(NOTE: To be fair, one of the benefits of belonging in a church is the sense of community it provides its members. But to be truthful, the sense of community can exist with or without the church's machinations. But it is the church which can't survive without a community to back it up - imagine that! & imagine this too: the church knows that as true and is afraid you'll know it too.)

Thus their insistence, their energy, their efforts, their voices, their strength poured out in building / re-building / promoting every tenet their self-important mindset could conjure - sans the truth/common sense/reality and force majeure.

Who else had the gall to declare that

`Hey, limbo doesnt really exist yall, we were just guessing that it did for 2 millenia. So now we think it doesnt so all those unbaptized dead babies we said will go to hell -- we were all just kidding. I mean, somebody's got to think up of something. It's difficult coming up with new material all the time, duh.'



You know all those Coke `Happiness', Jollibee commercials etc. advertising agencies punch out every few months or so? It has to be different each time because people need to be reminded to buy Coke and eat Jollibee right? & in a not-boring way. That's what the church does with these "new" tenets.

They have to make up something new to keep themselves visible in the public mind. There was the longer rosary beads, the dissolution of limbo and now -- guess what the new buzz word is?

RH Bill.

They're not changing any tenet here, just highlighting/promoting and tooting their own horn again.


And sans the fact that Pinoys love to have sex but some dislike having to actually take care of babies (as shown by the 'Pamparegla' paraphernalia outside Quiapo church); that sex is natural (it's what got us here in the first place) -- the church and all its pseudo-eunuchs insist they know how you should make families and that you should make babies.

That would give people reason to talk about them, hate them, notice them, believe them, root for them or not - the important thing is that you noticed they're still there. They're still relevant enough to be liked/disliked/thumbs up-ed or thumbs-down-ed.


And their autistic because they can only see their relevance, their need to be relevant and that you should think the same way they do minus what you really think or feel about what they want you to think and feel.

Their relevance only exists in their heads and has nothing to do with reality.





2 PNoyNoy



How is PNoyNoy autistic?

We could only note the blatant ones readily available in media, and these are the following:

Smiling while inspecting the site of a tragic hostage-taking and talking to media about the hostage-taking.






Allegedly not answering the phone when being called by a foreign official in the midst of a national and foreign emergency.


Blaming PGMA for everything wrong in this country.




Blaming Noli de Castro during an anniversary media party.




Inability to admit or accept blame.


Using the stage as a medium to air his personal grievances and preferences (so 15th century colonial catholic church much).





If you cannot see these as PNoy's failure to submit himself to reality, you're probably autistic yourself (yes, name-calling is easy and it works).



3 Star Cinema movies

We will restrict these to the most recent movies released last year and early this year.



This movie says, as according to Jessica Zafra:

The Sexy Mistress has lived in New York, ergo she is “liberated”, which in the Philippines is a synonym for “promiscuous”.

The Beautiful Wife is a good girl, hence she does not wear mascara and she has long, straight black hair that she wears in a ponytail.

They should engage in public bitch fights in which handbags become metaphors for the man they are fighting over.

The cheating husband endures excruciating physical torment as a substitute for castration.

The mistress goes back to New York, where all the bad girls are supposed to go, which makes you wonder who won exactly.


The reality of the actual dynamics between wives and mistresses is not shown in this movie, not even an iota of it. Sure, movies are supposed to entertain but should also be logical. Life doesnt make sense but movies actually should.





Does this need any explanation?

Could you suspend your imagination for 90 minutes or so enough to believe that Piolo P could fall for Angelica P?

To be fair, Piolo and Angelica - they're both very pretty.

They're both very sexy.

But Angelica has more balls to do comedy and make fun of herself compared to Papa P.

I dont need to say more.




This movie hails autism and advocates the fact that the lives of peripheral characters do not matter unless they serve the purpose of the 2 major stars' characters.

The reality is, no one in their healthy minds would want to serve as a prop for other people's agenda. But this movie says they can and it also proves that it is romantic and fun to do so.





4 All those Shampoo Commercials

Most Philippine shampoo commercials assume that

only females wash their hair,



all Filipino women have straight, long hair (or at least they should - to better increase the sale of shampoos),




long straight hair trumps talent,



Philippine hair has a mind of its own,

beautiful hair = kiss/sex/love/self-esteem.




5 Willie Revillame

Willie Revillame believes his own delusion, greatness

and any proof to the contrary are merely provided by those who envy his blessed financial etc. state.

Check out these posts on Willie Revillame.




But this list is not comprehensive. Psychological, spiritual, emotional autism is rampant everywhere. Have you checked your own view of reality?

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dear Miss. My son has autism, which is a serious neurological disorder our family lives with every day. Thankfully, he does not exhibit any of the qualities you hedged your arguments on in creating this list. He is neither "unintelligent" nor "indifferent" -- adjectives which would have been more accurate, in place of "autistic". "Autistic" is not a negative human trait -- it is a medical condition with language and behavior manifestations. It may benefit the editorial voice of this article if you read other sources on the definition of autism. I wish you well -- peace!

Cheez Miss on August 7, 2012 at 6:50 PM said...

Hello Mona thanks for your comment I appreciate it very much. This post was written after I saw a tweet describing the proRHbill rally specifically a speech made by an Archbishop where according to

@raissawriter In an apparent taunt directed at PNoy, Archbishop said Church is "not autistic"

so this post is referring to that context of how the Church is making a jab to a Head of State and is throwing around words freely and insensitively.
Perfectly,at that time I was also reading a book of M Scott Peck where he equates narcissism to spiritual `autism' (he doesnt refer to it inthe context of a medical condition but an almost Christian definition of one's inability to surrender ones self to reality). That is the context of this post.

But my sincere apologies if you were offended.

Honestly, true there is NOTHING WRONG with autism as a medical condition. I feel what is actually more worse is spiritual and psychological emotional `autism' which makes a non-autistic person behave with no empathy. Yes persons who are medically autistic actually exhibit more sensitivity compared to those who are emotionally trapped in their own view of the world. Sadly, a personality disorder is actuallyharder to treat than a neurological disorder and is more life-destroying.

Mona V. on August 7, 2012 at 9:27 PM said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Hi Miss. Thanks for your reply! I totally understand your reaction to Fr. Soc's speech. :)

As all autism families would attest, autism is a difficult, expensive, emotionally-draining condition to live with; but in many more ways, a blessing -- so in those terms, yes, there IS nothing wrong with autism. There IS something wrong when "autistic" is used as a joke or an insult. It is not a fair analogy for a negative personality trait or inconsiderate behavior. It is also not a suitable adjective for inanimate objects.

Wikis would describe autism as a developmental disorder -- no spiritual or emotional varieties*. The Philippines and many other countries legally recognizes it as a disability. Autism is a lifetime condition with treatment but no known universal cure -- it is not a choice.

I am among many parents who do not want "autistic" to morph (further than it already has) from being a medical term to a slur in Filipino colloquialism. Words like "lame", "mongoloid" and "retarded" started out as disabilities which became the harshest of insults through intemperate use.

I write to you because you are a passionate writer with an honest voice. You manage a medium that can inspire young people like you to become better versions of themselves. If you wish to use the word "autistic" as a literary device, using correct qualifiers that better explain your intent would avoid confusion. Using "autistic" accurately would be the kind thing to do.

*Reading other books might give you more insight on autism. I would recommend "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Mark Haddon; and "Thinking in Pictures" by Temple Grandin. Both written by intelligent, engaged individuals with autism.

Please consider re-reading the article from the point of view of an sister or mom of someone with autism; and decide for yourself if you would like to change anything. Hope you and your loved ones are safe from the ravages of flood. Peace!

Cheez Miss on August 7, 2012 at 9:55 PM said...

"The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Mark Haddon; I LOVE THAT BOOK!!!! HAVE read that and it made me cry.

True -- autism as a medical condition is not a choice. I could not imagine what you and your family and other families go through everyday and every moment.

Sadly, there is also spiritual autism and in this case those who are afflicted with it have it HAVE A CHOICE but opt not to take it. That I feel is much much worse than the medical condition (I was in a relationship with someone who had this & its destructive to everyone).

Thanks to your comment I have contextualized my post and qualified what I meant about the term. But its intention is also to reflect the church's own insensitivity to the term.

Peace to you too Mona and to your family! Blessings to you!!!

Harry Balls on August 9, 2012 at 8:13 AM said...

Cheez Miss... or whatever the hell your birth name is... you obviously have a small brain and your parents wasted money sending you to school or wherever the hell you learned your english because you obviously are very confused and misinformed...

Do not confuse religion with the wants and needs of special children!!! Get a life and shut up if you do not understand!!! Your site should be blocked and you must know that you have no right to educate people using your blog site because you are a dumb ass!!!

Persons with autism are better off than people like you... How is that for freedom of speech?

Cheez Miss on August 9, 2012 at 8:23 AM said...

"How is that for freedom of speech?"

Thats kool, thats freedom.

Freedom also comes with responsibility, so youre also free to explain how I am "very confused and misinformed..." and how I "confuse religion with the wants and needs of special children!"

Also, please indicate where in my post am I referring to special children?

Cheez Miss on August 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM said...

ATTENTION Commenters: Explain before you complain.

Cheez Miss on August 9, 2012 at 8:28 PM said...

Attention Again Readers and Commenters, This post isnt about special kids who have autism or parents of these special kids, those who insist that I am talking about them, I am not.

Be aware too if you're using this post to project your fears and insecurity.

The post's intention is to mock the way a seen-to-be-`noble' and `Christian' institution used the term "autistic" carelessly and casually. If it isn't already obvious, I highlight the fact that the post intends to reflect that carelessness.

You dont have to make this post about you, though your free to do that too.

Anonymous said...

Tacky, tasteless, and tactless. No offense to you, Cheez Miss, but that is all what I can say about this post.

From an autistic dude living in a neurotypical world

Cheez Miss on August 10, 2012 at 4:24 AM said...

thats exactly the point of the post! thank God someone got it. because it was similarly inspired by a tacky tasteless tactless statement from a "respected" PH institution.

Anonymous said...

You tell me, Cheez Miss. Considering that the Official Roman Church claims to be "respected," it delivering slurs like that is so way beyond me. Well, what do we expect from that idolatrous, hypocritical, backstabbing, lying so-called "church"?

Cheez Miss on August 11, 2012 at 1:31 AM said...

"what do we expect from that idolatrous, hypocritical, backstabbing, lying so-called "church"?

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition http://youtu.be/vt0Y39eMvpI

Post a Comment

ShareThis

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Share

 

Total Pageviews

Search

Resources

Site Info

CheezMiss Copyright © 2009 Blogger Template Designed by Bie Blogger Template